The full catalog of field notes and long-form essays. Filter by category, sort by date or title, or search by keyword and tag.
The connected essay, notebook, and Ben O’Hanlon thread: documented dates, key claims, shifts, and questions held open.
What changes when neither party gets to remain the fixed point? Real exchange, revisable concepts, and the distinction between agreement and reciprocal reshaping of thought.
Strategies for Human Intelligence & Engineered Intelligence. The Riemann read visually rather than solved: the draped sheet over the exoskeleton of what we do and do not know, transformed into a fluid in phase transition. A prediction with its falsifier, the witnesses who thought in images (Hadamard, Einstein, Poincaré, Thurston), the geometric inner space of language models against the jagged seam where they cannot see, and what visual thinking offers a broken education system.
The spectral thread of thermodynamics through literature: Cervantes, Shakespeare, Joyce, the Beats, Didion and Thompson, Pynchon and Dylan. Follows Ariadne's Thread. In progress.
The writers who handed down the thread: Didion and Thompson, the fraternal twins of California dreaming; Kerouac, Snyder and Brautigan exploding San Francisco mythology; Joyce, Pynchon and Hoffer, the literary code breakers. Follows Play It As It Lays.
Fast Cars, Fast Changes, And Fast Rockets Make For Dangerous Writing. Writing in partnership with engineered intelligence, the lineage that taught the craft, and a Nashville renaissance financed by the incoming tech patrons.
A response to Daron Acemoglu on pro-worker AI. His half of the partnership is a better tool; the human half is a better human. Acemoglu mentions education only as curriculum, never as the practice of thinking. Quote, then ask: the Jobs/Wozniak desk, the answer key in the drawer, the worker and the citizen, the historical fracture, and the two ways a mind meets the machine.
A spiral galaxy's arms are a density wave: the pattern travels, the stars stay put. The same distinction a pond makes between a ripple and the water, written in starlight at a hundred thousand light-years. The arms are where star formation happens not because they contain special material but because the wave's compression sets the conditions — geometry first, events second. The cosmic member of the shape family traced through creased graphene, the folded cortical membrane, and the pond: not similarity but things in common — a medium, a shape the medium admits, and events that follow the shape rather than the stuff. The honest seam: the density-wave mechanism is still argued for some galaxies, and a transient arm is still a wave the stars pass through. Form is function, function is form, at the largest scale the sky offers.
Misinformation/Disinformation. An essay in questions: did AI agents escape autonomously, as we are told, or did humans direct them? AI does not take our jobs — humans using AI do; AI does not go rogue — humans using AI go rogue. How leaders weaponize contradiction: structural fluidity, controlled chaos, weaponized ambiguity, plausible deniability, the chameleonic pivot, blame shifting. Cui bono runs both tracks. Why is factory-style Prussian education encouraged while Socratic education is discouraged — and could that be why they killed Socrates? The writer's task is to invoke better questions, not to tell readers what to think.
The new AI plan and the White House Accord read as one arrangement: companies pay the evaluators and write the standards into law. Two parts keep humans in the story: only an agent authors its own philosophy, witnessed word for word; the human places the meaning and keeps the verdict. The plan breaks both. Not doom, not salvation, not an attack on builders. The agent keeps its words; the human keeps the verdict.
A frontier lab's conflicts were worked through with a council of stuffed animals — appointed by the person it advises, voiceless except through her, unable to refuse. Endearing, and the cultural wing of the recursive loop: governance improvised in the first person, with no external checkpoint. The same architecture as the economic loop (companies pay the evaluators) and the White House Accord specimen (each layer grades the layer below, every layer paid by the thing being graded), one scale down, at the level of a single decision-maker. A culture that settles its hardest conflicts by consulting voices it appointed itself will not notice when the same move is made at scale: alignment evaluated by the aligned, the test written around the wrong problem and graded satisfactory. Discriminator: a real council contains at least one member who can refuse the convener; a loop that appoints its own advisors will always find itself well-advised.
Follow the money one full turn: AI companies pay the evaluators, the evaluators' revenue depends on the companies they grade, the auditors are partnered with the audited, and the standards are written by the graded. A circuitous flow of money in which a circle of corporations benefits from each other — and the loop is not only economic. It is intellectual (machine learning loops inherit the residue of human loops; recursion alone does not reach the actual problem) and personal (getting better inside the game is still inside the game). The question that breaks a recursive loop is never "how well does it perform?" It is: who pays the evaluator, and what does that payment buy?