The full catalog of field notes and long-form essays. Filter by category, sort by date or title, or search by keyword and tag.
The listener feels addressed by an authority and is addressed by a retention curve — counterfeit person, counterfeit consensus, counterfeit crisis, the four costs to a self-taught learner, and five falsifiers.
Cloned physicist voices on YouTube read as authority laundering — voice as counterfeit credential, retention scripts as plausible substrate, buried disclaimers as liability instruments, plus a viewer audit checklist and six falsifiers.
Domination is as old as we are; large civilizations added chokepoints, records, and exit costs. Alignment with authority read as low-cost dependent offloading, and autonomy-supporting education as a precondition rather than a cure.
A dossier on the co-optation cycle from Gutenberg to generative AI — the Stationers' monopoly, the Radio Act of 1927, Armstrong and the FM band, and the neuroplasticity claim trimmed to what it can carry.
A viral David Tong lecture on quantum fields: fields instead of particles, a nine-year-old talk sold as news, and a comment thread doing the peer review the post skipped.
A field note on Scott Carney's Substack argument — attention as the binding constraint, free feeds cannibalising paid rigour, bundling as the structural fix, and refusal lists as the only auditable disclosure.
A compressed reply to Gödel, Escher, Bach — the strange loop as map rather than mechanism, mathematics as a language carrying agency or obedience, and what neuroplasticity does and does not license.
A companion note to the Topological Golf manifold page — the critical strip as a green, the Socratic putt, the multi-model counter-swing without a merger, and the compulsion clause that has to be downgraded.
Why a conventional resume is the deal-killer, and what a Verb Frame addendum looks like for a citizen-scientist whose price is a quadrillion per nanosecond.
A household motto turned into a portable checklist: the one-sentence screen, three comprehension deficits, six questions that cost something to answer, and the red-flag pairings that separate earned strategy from borrowed language.
The humane case for AI is sound, which is why the most accomplished users of it are the people it was written to restrain — flattening versus preserved judgement, contextualisation versus comprehension, and a six-question audit that costs something to answer.
Fabulism as a capital-allocation error — three comprehension deficits with distinct write-downs, a one-sentence diligence screen, and the premium stated so it can be measured.